Interpretation of magnetic and geoelectrical data based on geological and mineralogical evidence in the podiform chromite prospecting, Khoy ophiolite, Northwest Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

• Behnam Mehdikhani
• Ali Imamalipour

Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

10.22067/econg.2021.51605.84028

Abstract

Introduction
Podiform chromite deposits are small magmatic chromite bodies formed in the lower section of an ophiolite complex. The Khoy ophiolite covers an extensive area in the northwest of Iran along the Iran-Turkey border.
In this research study 1200 magnetometry data and geoelectric studies along 5 profiles were designed for prospecting chromite lenses. Mineralogical and geological studies have shown that pyrite, magnetite and other metallic sulfides are formed during the serpentinization process in the fractures of chromite lenses. The amount of released magnetite in the chromitites is less than the amount released in the harzburgite and dunites. Therefore, the number of magnetic anomalies created are less than those generated by bedrocks (Imamalipour, 2009). These metal sulfides increase the chargeability of positive anomalies in the cross-sections. Resistivity also shows a significant reduction compared to the bedrocks due to the metallic properties of chromite lenses.
 
Materials and methods
In this research study, geological methods were used to interpret geophysical data in the Khoy ophiolite. Geological surveys at a scale of 1:20000 were implemented in an area of about 70 km2. 1200 magnetic points and resistivity and induced polarization along 5 profiles with a geological map and mineralogical studies were used. Magnetometric data at the 5*10m grid and Ip-Rs data with 10 m interval electrode spacing were collected. 
For the inversion modeling of Ip-Rs data, Res2d inv software was used and geological and mineralogical data were integrated with magnetometric results.
 
Discussion
Exploration of podiform chromite deposits has been a challenge due to their unpredictable occurrence, small size of most orebodies, and intensive tectonic dislocations (Mosier et al., 2012). Moreover, the absence of primary geochemical halos and associated alteration are issues that lead to difficulties in prospecting for podiform chromites. Chromite is an accessory mineral associated with the harzburgite host rock. The results of geophysical studies show that chromite lenses have lower magnetization than gabbro and higher mangnetization than harzburgite (Frasheri et al., 1995). The reason is the mineralogical conditions of chromite lenses and their host rocks. Mineralogical study showed that some chromite lenses have fractures that are filled with silicate secondary minerals (serpentine). Chromite and serpentine are the main minerals, and hematite and magnetite are minor minerals in the chromite orebodies. Although these minerals have been altered and have mostly been converted to serpentine, the earliest composition is likely to be olivine. Dunite and harzburgites are chromite lenses host rock and are mainly serpentinized and contain fine magnetite particles, which can cause positive magnetic anomaly (Imamalipour, 2009, Masoudi and Imamalipour, 2019). These small metallic minerals cause high induced polarization and the embedded rocks show a higher degree of charge. Because of the metallic nature of chromite lenses, the resistivity has a much lower value. Therefore, using resistivity, induced polarization, and magnetic geophysical methods, chromite lenses can be separated from harzburgite host rocks.
 
Results
In this study, geophysical resistivity and inductive polarization method with magnetometry, which is one of the most important methods for the exploration of subsurface deposits in the Khoy ophiolitic zone, have been used. As a result, it was found that podiform chromite does not show much difference in the magnitude of the magnetic field. Therefore, this method cannot alone be used to explore chromite deposits. However, the IP-Rs method can be used as a practical method for exploration of these reserves. Chromite lenses have low resistivity values of about 400 to 600 ohm-m. The amount of induced polarization is also much lower than its host rock, with values of 3 to 6 mv/v. Therefore, these properties can be used for chromite exploration at a much lower cost than gravimetric and electromagnetic methods. The reason for these values can also be found in the mineralogy of the chromitite lenses. During the serpentinization process of harzburgite and dunite, magnetite minerals, chalcopyrite, and some metallic elements are released. Released magnetite increases the magnetic properties of chromitite. However, this increase is less than the magnetism of the host rock. The released metallic elements such as chalcopyrite with serpentinite also increase the changeability of the host rocks and chromite lenses with low induction polarization and much lower resistivity could be identified.

Keywords

• Ophiolite
• podiform chromite
• Prospecting
• Resistivity
• Induced polarization Magnetometry

20.1001.1.20087306.1400.13.4.5.5

---

References

Arai, S. and Yurimoto, H., 1995. Possible sub arc origin of podiform chromitites. Island Arc, 4(2): 104-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1738.1995.tb00135.x

Fatehi, M. and Asadi Haroni, H. 2019. Geophysical signatures of the gold rich porphyry copper deposits: A case study at the Dalli Cu-Au porphyry deposit. Journal of Economic Geology, 10(2): 639-675. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/econg.v10i2.69539

Frasheri, A., Lubonja, L. and Alikaj, P., 1995. On the application of geophysics in the exploration for copper and chrome ores in Albania Geophysical prospecting, 43(6): 743-757. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1995.tb00278.x

Imamalipour, A., 2001. Metallogeny of Khoy ophiolite with special regard to sulfide deposits associated with the volcanic rocks of Qezildash area. Doctoral dissertation, Ph.D. thesis, University of Shahid Beheshti. Tehran, Iran: pp: 359. (in Persian). Retrived Mar 2, 2021 from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=14784208654835818760&hl=en&as_sdt=2005&sciodt=0,5

Imamalipour, A., 2009. Mineralogy of accessory and rare minerals associated with chromite deposits in the Khoy area. Iranian Journal of Crystallography and Mineralogy, 16(4): 559-570. (in Persian with English abstract). Retrived Mar 2, 2021 from https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=138277

Masoudi, J. and Imamalipour, A., 2019. Application of geological methods for prospecting of podiform chromite deposits in the Khoy ophiolite zone, Northwestern Iran, Journal Of Economic Geology, 11(2), pp: 285-303. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/ 10.22067/econg.v11i2.70623

Khalatbari-Jafari, M., Juteau, T., Bellon, H., Whitechurch, H., Cotten, J. and Emami, H., 2004. New geological, geochronological and geochemical investigations on the Khoy ophiolites and related formations, NW Iran. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 23(4): 507-535. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jseaes.2003.07.006

Loke, M. H. and Barker, R. D., 1995. Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections. Geophysics, 60(6): 1682-1690. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443900

Meju, M. A., 1995. Simple effective resistivity-depth transformations for infield or real-time data processing. Computers & Geosciences, 21(8): 985-992. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0098-3004(95)00035-7

Masoudi, J. and Imamalipour, A. 2019. Application of geological methods for prospecting of podiform chromite deposits in the Khoy ophiolite zone, Northwestern Iran. Journal of Economic Geology, 11(2): 285-303. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/econg.v11i2.70623

Melcher, F., Grum, W., Simon, G., Thalhammer, T. V. and Stumpfl, E. F., 1997. Petrogenesis of the ophiolitic giant chromite deposits of Kempirsai, Kazakhstan: a study of solid and fluid inclusions in chromite. Journal of Petrology, 38(10): 1419-1458. https://doi.org/10.1093/petroj/38.10.1419

Radfar, J. and Amini, B., 2009. Geological map of Khoy 1:100000 series, sheet 4967. Geological Survey of Iran. Retrived Mar 2, 2021 from https://gsi.ir/fa/map/7/%D8%AE%D9%88%D9%89

Rajabzadeh, M.A. and Al Sadi, F., 2015. Sulfide mineralization in ultramafic rocks of the Faryab ophiolite complex, southern Kerman. Journal of Economic Geology, 7(2): 259-276. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/econg.v7i2.35550

Szalai, S. and Szarka, L., 2008. On the classification of surface geoelectric arrays. Geophysical Prospecting, 56(2), 159-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00673.x

Mosier, D. L., Singer, D. A., Moring, B. C. and Galloway, J. P., 2012. Podiform chromite deposits database and grade and tonnage models. USGS Scientific Investigations Report, 2012-5157, 45pp. US Geological Survey. Retrived Mar 2, 2021 from https://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2012/5157

Uysal, I., Sadiklar, M. B., Tarkian, M., Karsli, O. and Aydin, F., 2005. Mineralogy and composition of the chromitites and their platinum-group minerals from Ortaca (Muğla-SW Turkey): evidence for ophiolitic chromitite genesis. Mineralogy and Petrology, 83(3-4): 219-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00710-004-0063-3

Whitney, D.L. and Evans, B.W., 2010. Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals. American mineralogist, 95(1), 185-187. https://doi.org/10.1111/10.2138/am.2010.3371

Zaeimnia, F. Kananian, A. Arai, A. Mirmohammadi, M. Imamalipour, A. Zaki Khedr, M. Makoto Miura, M. and Abbou-Kebir, K., 2017. Mineral chemistry and petrogenesis of chromitites from the Khoy ophiolite complex, Northwestern Iran: Implications for aggregation of two ophiolites. Island Arc, 26(6): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/iar.12211

Zhou, M. F., Robinson, P. T., Malpas, J. and Li, Z., 1996. Podiform chromitites in the Luobusa ophiolite (southern Tibet): implications for melt-rock interaction and chromite segregation in the upper mantle. Journal of Petrology, 37(1): 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/petrology/37.1.3

Zhou, M. F. and Robinson, P. T., 1997. Origin and tectonic environment of podiform chromite deposits. Economic Geology, 92(2): 259-262. https://doi.org/10.2113/gsecongeo.92.2.259