Relationship between Textural and Mineralogical Properties of Crystalline Igneous Rocks Using Textural Quantification by Image Analysis

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

1 Ferdowsi University of Mashhad

2 Urmia University

Abstract

Introduction
The mineralogical and textural characteristics of rock materials have an important influence on physico-mechanical properties. The effects of some textural characteristics like grain size (Brace, 1961), grain shape (Cox and Budhu, 2008), grain surface (Diepenbroek et al., 1992), grain size distribution (Gurkan Ozgurel and Vipulanandan, 2005), and grains interlocking (Hoek, 1965) on physico-mechanical behavior of rock materials has always been emphasized. On the other hand, it has been found that textural properties are originally controlled by the mineralogy and chemistry of rock materials (Locat et al., 1984). Knowing the textural, mineralogical and chemical properties of rock materials and understanding the governing relationships can help us predict the quantitative and qualitative behavior of rock materials. The aim of this study is to investigate the interrelationships among the various textural properties besides the relationship between the textural characteristics and the mineralogy and chemical composition.
 
Materials and methods
Fifteen crystalline igneous rock samples including a wide variety of rock types and grain size were collected from the granite quarries of NW Iran (Fig. 1) and the thin sections of the samples were prepared for quantification of the textural characteristic by image acquisition analysis under a polarized microscope. A total of 360 digital photomicrographs of each thin section were taken from the entire surface area of the thin section in three steps of natural light (PPL), polarizing light (XPL), and polarized light by a 45° rotation of the stage (Fig. 2). After preprocessing of distortion and skewness, the images were joined by Adobe Photoshop software to make the integrated mosaic image layers. The grain boundary tracing was carried out by drawing the grain outline through the interface of the adjacent grains via the three mosaic image layers on the background using the JMicroVision software (schematic diagram in Fig. 3). Simultaneously, identification and documentation of the mineral grains (crystals) were conducted by utilizing the optical properties of the minerals occurring in image layers. Overall, about 18,000 mineral grains were traced from the thin sections of fifteen samples. The accomplished graphic files after some of the file-format conversions were loaded by the ArcMap program to extract the main geometric textural properties like length, width, area, perimeter, circularity, and some related geometric concepts (Fig. 4) which were used to calculate  advanced textural parameters such as roughness, rugosity, etc. Simultaneously, the mineralogy composition of the samples was obtained from the covered area of minerals in thin sections and used for classification of the samples according to the IUGS system (Fig. 5). In addition, textural mineral distribution map (TMDM) of the samples (Fig 6) were prepared and used to do petrographic textural studies of the samples.
 
Discussion
The results of correlations revealed that "size" is the most important textural parameter, which shows a notable relationship with mineralogy and chemical composition of the studied rock samples. Moreover, the result exhibited that the number frequency graphs of the grains (crystals) size distribution are asymmetric and non-normal that show negative (right) skewness. Consequently, arithmetic average cannot be an acceptable statistical mean to determine the average of the grain size due to the fine-grains tendency error, whereas textural and qualitative properties of rock are mainly controlled by the coarse and moderate grains content. Thus, the area-weighted mean diameter extracted from the cumulative distribution curves, (Fig 22) was suggested instead of the common arithmetic average to determine the mean grains size of the crystallized rock material. In addition, it was found that the elongation (aspect ratio) of the grains shows a good correlation with most of the shape-metric and grains-interrelation parameter. Thus, it should be considered as an efficient textural index to evaluate the grains interrelationships rather than the common texture coefficient (TC) index because of the simplicity and rapidity of its calculation.
 
Results and Conclusions
The statistical mean of the geometric textural parameters besides the total constituent grains were determined for the main minerals phases (quartz, plagioclase, alkali-feldspar) and mafic minerals (here all the other minerals). Therefore, correlation analyses were conducted among the various non-phasic and phasic textural variable as well as the chemical and mineralogical composition. The analysis was carried out through classification of textural parameters into three main groups of size-metric (diameter, area and perimeter), shape-metric (elongation, circularity, rectangularity, roundness, roughness, rugosity and compactness) and grain-interaction (size homogeneity, heterogeneity index, interlocking index and Texture Coefficient) parameters with respect to the nature of parameters' demands. Considering abundance of the evaluating textural variable, at first, the matrix correlations among the various textural, mineralogical and chemical variables were calculated and the significant correlations were interpreted via linear regression analyses and graphical illustrations.
 
References
Brace, W.F., 1961. Dependence of fracture strength of rocks on grain size. 4th Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA.
Cox, M.R. and Budhu, M., 2008. A practical approach to grain shape quantification. Engineering Geology, 96(1–2): 1–16.
Diepenbroek, M., Bartholomä, A., and Ibbeken, H., 1992. How round is round? A new approach to the topic “roundness” by Fourier grain shape analysis. Sedimentology, 39(3): 11–422.
Gurkan Ozgurel, H. and Vipulanandan, C., 2005. Effect of Grain Size and Distribution on Permeability and Mechanical Behavior of Acrylamide Grouted Sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(12): 1457–1465.
Hoek, E., 1965. Rock Fracture under Static Stress Conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 270 pp.
Locat, J., Lefebvre, G. and Ballivy, G., 1984. Mineralogy, chemistry, and physical properties interrelationships of some sensitive clays from Eastern Canada. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 21(3): 530–540.

Keywords


Arya, L.M., Leij, F.J., Shouse, P.J. and van Genuchten, M.T., 1999. Relationship between the hydraulic conductivity function and the particle-size distribution. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 63(5): 1063–1070.
Ayati, F. and Mahdevari, S., 2010. Comparison of chemistry of igneous and hydrothermal biotite in igneous rocks of Sakht-Hesar Mountain. Journal of Economic Geology, 1(1): 117–134. (in Persian with English abstract)
Bentz, D.P., Garboczi, E.J., Haecker, C.J. and Jensen, O.M., 1999. Effects of cement particle size distribution on performance properties of Portland cement-based materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 29(10): 1663–1671.
Brace, W.F., 1961. Dependence of fracture strength of rocks on grain size. 4th Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA.
Bryon, D.N., 1995. The Interpretation of Granitic Textures from Serial Thin Sectioning, Image Analysis and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction. Mineralogical Magazine, 59(395): 203–211.
Cashman, K.V. and Marsh, B.D., 1988. Crystal size distribution (CSD) in rocks and the kinetics and dynamics of crystallization II: Makaopuhi Lava Lake. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 99(3): 292–305.
Cole, J.P., 1964. Study of major and minor civil divisions in political geography. 20th International Geographical Congress, Sheffield, UK.
Cox, E.P., 1927. A method of assigning numerical and percentage values to the degree of roundness of sand grains. Journal of Paleontology, 1(3): 179–183.
Cox, M.R. and Budhu, M., 2008. A practical approach to grain shape quantification. Engineering Geology, 96(1–2): 1–16.
Davis, J.C. and Sampson, R.J., 1986. Statistics and data analysis in geology, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, New York, 656 pp.
DeVasto, M.A., Czeck, D.M. and Bhattacharyya, P., 2012. Using image analysis and ArcGIS® to improve automatic grain boundary detection and quantify geological images. Computers & Geosciences, 49: 38–45.
Diepenbroek, M., Bartholomä, A., and Ibbeken, H., 1992. How round is round? A new approach to the topic “roundness” by Fourier grain shape analysis. Sedimentology, 39(3): 11–422.
Dreyer, W., 1973. The Science of Rock Mechanics. Part I. The strength properties of rocks, Series on rock and soil mechanics. Trans Tech Publications, Ohio, USA, 501 pp.
Duarte, M.T., Liu, H., Kou, S.Q., Lindqvist, P.A. and Miskovsky, K., 2005. Microstructural Modeling Approach Applied to Rock Material. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 14(1): 104–111.
Dunlop, G., Bettles, C.J., Griffiths, J.R., Venkatesan, K., Zheng, L. and Qian, M., 2003. The Effect of Grain Size on the Mechanical Properties of AM-SC1. 6th International Conference Magnesium Alloys and Their Applications, Shenyang, China.
Ehrlich, R. and Weinberg, B., 1970. An exact method for characterization of grain shape. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 40(1): 205–212.
Evans, C.L. and Napier-Munn, T.J., 2013. Estimating error in measurements of mineral grain size distribution. Minerals Engineering, 52: 198–203.
Fazeli, B., Khalili, M., Beavers, R., Mansouri-Esfahani, M. and Loghmani-Dastjerdi, Z., 2017. Petrology of Oligocene Ghaleh Yaghmesh granitoids in the west of Yazd province. Journal of Economic Geology, 8(2): 473–491. (in Persian with English abstract)
Feniak, M.W., 1944. Grain sizes and shapes of various minerals in igneous rocks. American Mineralogist, 29(11–12): 415–421.
Feret, L.R., 1931. La Grosseur Des Grains Des Matières Pulverulentes (The Size of Powdery Material Grains). International Association of Assay Materials Conferenc, Zurich, Switzerland.
Fueten, F., 1997. A computer-controlled rotating polarizer stage for the petrographic microscope. Computers & Geosciences, 23(2)‌:203–208.
Gokceoglu, C., Yesiloglu-Gultekin, N., Keceli, A.S., Sezer, E.A., Can, A.B. and Bayhan, H., 2012. An Experimental Study on the Min-Image Production for Determination of Mineral Percentages. EGU General Assembly Conference, Vienna, Austria.
Goodchild, I. and Fueten, F., 1998. Edge detection in petrographic images using the rotating polarizer stage. Computers & Geosciences, 24(8): 745–751.
Gurkan Ozgurel, H. and Vipulanandan, C., 2005. Effect of Grain Size and Distribution on Permeability and Mechanical Behavior of Acrylamide Grouted Sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 131(12): 1457–1465.
Hamdi, P., Stead, D. and Elmo, D., 2015. Characterizing the influence of stress-induced microcracks on the laboratory strength and fracture development in brittle rocks using a finite-discrete element method-micro discrete fracture network FDEM-μDFN approach. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 7(6): 609–625.
Heilbronner, R., 2000. Automatic grain boundary detection and grain size analysis using polarization micrographs or orientation images. Journal of Structural Geology, 22(7): 969–981.
Higgins, M.D., 2006. Quantitative textural measurements in igneous and metamorphic petrology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 276 pp.
Hoek, E., 1965. Rock Fracture under Static Stress Conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa, 270 pp.
Howarth, D.F. and Rowlands, J.C., 1987. Quantitative assessment of rock texture and correlation with drillability and strength properties. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 20(1): 57–85.
Hussain, M., Minhas, N.R., Saad, B. and Nair, A., 2017. Rock Texture Characterization from Automated Petrographic Analysis. SPE Middle East Oil & Gas Conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Manama, Bahrain.
Jensen, L.R.D., Friis, H., Fundal, E., Moller, P. and Jespersen, M., 2010. Analysis of limestone micromechanical properties by optical microscopy. Engineering Geology, 110(3–4): 43–50.
Kekec, B., Unal, M. and Sensogut, C., 2006. Effect of the textural properties of rocks on their crushing and grinding features. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing, Mineral, Metallurgy, Material, 13(5): 385–392.
Knight, P.D., Klassen, R.A. and Hunt, P., 2002. Mineralogy of fine-grained sediment by energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) image analysis-a methodology. Environmental Geology, 42(1): 32–40.
Lan, H., Martin, C.D. and Hu, B., 2010. Effect of heterogeneity of brittle rock on micromechanical extensile behavior during compression loading. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 115(B1): 1–14
Lindqvist, J.E., Åkesson, U. and Malaga, K., 2007. Microstructure and functional properties of rock materials. Materials Characterization, 58(11-12): 1183–1188.
Locat, J., Lefebvre, G. and Ballivy, G., 1984. Mineralogy, chemistry, and physical properties interrelationships of some sensitive clays from Eastern Canada. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 21(3): 530–540.
Mermillod-Blondin, R., Benzaazoua, M., Kongolo, M., de Donato, P., Bussière, B. and Marion, P., 2011. Development and Calibration of a Quantitative, Automated Mineralogical Assessment Method Based on SEM-EDS and Image Analysis: Application for Fine Tailings. Journal of Minerals and Materials Characterization and Engineering, 10(12): 1111–1130.
Nålsund, R. and Jensen, V., 2013. Influence of mineral grain size, grain size distribution and micro-cracks on rocks’ mechanical strength. 14th Euroseminar on Microscopy Applied to Building Materials, Helsingør, Denmark.
Peng, J., Wong, L.N.Y. and Teh, C.I., 2017. Influence of grain size heterogeneity on strength and microcracking behavior of crystalline rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 122(2): 1054–1073.
Petruk, W., 1986. Image analysis: an overview of developments, CANMET Report 86-4E. Canada Centre for Mineral and Energy Technology, Ottawa, Canada.
Pettijohn, F.J., Potter, P.E. and Siever, R., 1973. Sand and Sandstone. Springer-Verlag, New York, 618 pp.
Ross, B.J., Fueten, F. and Yashkir, D.Y., 2001. Automatic mineral identification using genetic programming. Machine Vision and Applications, 13(2): 61–69.
Saltikov, S.A., 1967. The determination of the size distribution of particles in an opaque material from a measurement of the size distribution of their sections. 2th International Congress for Stereology, Chicago, USA.
Schneiderhöhn, P., 1954. Eine vergleichende Studie über Methoden zur quantitativen Bestimmung von Abrundung und Form an Sandkörnern (Im Hinblick auf die Verwendbarkeit an Dünnschliffen.). Heidelberger Beiträge zur Mineralogie und Petrographie, 4(1): 172–191.
Singh, S.K., 1988. Relationship among fatigue strength, mean grain size and compressive strength of a rock. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 21(4): 271–276.
Streckeisen, A., 1976. To each plutonic rock its proper name. Earth-Science Reviews, 12(1): 1–33.
Sun, W., Wang, L. and Wang, Y., 2017. Mechanical properties of rock materials with related to mineralogical characteristics and grain size through experimental investigation: a comprehensive review. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 11(3): 322–328.
Tuğrul, A. and Zarif, I.H., 1999. Correlation of mineralogical and textural characteristics with engineering properties of selected granitic rocks from Turkey. Engineering Geology, 51(4): 303–317.
Ündül, Ö., 2016. Assessment of mineralogical and petrographic factors affecting petro-physical properties, strength and cracking processes of volcanic rocks. Engineering Geology, 210: 10–22
Vernon, R.H., 2004. A practical guide to rock microstructure. Cambridge university press, Sydney, 606 pp.
Whitney, D.L. and Evans, B.W., 2010. Abbreviations for names of rock-forming minerals. American Mineralogist, 95(1): 185–187.
Wong, W.X., 1998. Binary Image Segmentation of Aggregates Based On Polygonal Approximation and Classification of Concavities. Pattern Recognition, 31(10): 1503–1524.
Yılmaz, N.G., Mete Göktan, R., Gaşan, H. and Nuri Çelik, O., 2013. Particle Size Distribution and Shape Characterization of the Chips Produced During Granite Machining in Relation to Process Forces and Specific Energy. Particulate Science and Technology, 1(3): 277–286.
CAPTCHA Image